Jump to content

Back in 1985....


DemianTH
 Share

Recommended Posts

Helluuu everyone.

I was born in February 6, 1986, so if anyone cares there it is. So for what reason did I just typed my DOB? Well, cuz I didn't know there was actually a Windows 1.0 until now. I've seen some screenshots... JESUS WINDOWS EXISTED!!!! AND IT STANDS FOR IT'S NAME IN IT'S GUI. Indeed, as you are seeing in this C++ frame thingie right now, back in 1985 Microsoft developed this kind of GUI: a frame with a menu. It was shiz compared to today's Windows XP SP 2, though.

It's kernel (if any) was far too weak, obviously. If you hate seeing the Blue Screen Of Death, you must see how many reboots you can get in a day with Win 1.0. Why am I saying this anyway? Like all current OS, Windows 1.0, even MS DOS can crash. This reboot theory is just mere guessing, but I think of this because every Windows version have this flaw; some more often than usual, some have this problem rarely.

Taking the cons of Windows 1.0 apart, think of it as gold. You bought Windows in 5" disks (Former Drive B:, since it is EXTREMELY RARE to see a working machine with this drive)... LOTS OF 'EM!!! You installed it (This is kind of an advantage to CPM, since CPM had to boot itself everytime from Drive B. To install CPM was impossible). You worked in a window-based interface... and you shut the system down. BEAUTIFUL! GOLDEN!

Anyone that actually HAS Windows 1.0: Keep it. Save it. Worship it.

*Ajem* Well. Yeah I got a little excited about Windows 1.0. But I never heard of it, so I felt the urge to write an "article" about it. Hehehe.

It would be cool to use it once. It would be hell lots of fun... hahahaha. Kay then. Comment. Speak. Tell us your magical experience with Win 1.0 (if any).

DemianTH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am old enough to have been (un)fortunate to have used the early versions of Windows. Magical experience, it was not. Having been used to programs specifically designed to do one job and not try to be everything to everyone, Windows came as something as a shock.

As each new version was put on the market there was a collective sigh of relief in being able to get away from the foibles and idiosyncrasies and move on to the new version. This has continued right up until the introduction of the XP version although, perhaps, to a diminishing extent.

The blue screen of death makes less and less of an appearance now which make one think that Gates is getting nearer to a faultless system but, even in its current incarnation, there is a long way to go.

Perhaps Gates might consider this in his development. Rather than sticking ever more bits and bobs that only half work, he might wish to make a system where the BSOD is unknown and leave the development of peripheral programs and utilities to other, more competent workers and not beg, borrow and steal parts of their software to shove into Windows and end up with a very poor version of the original.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy