Belatucadrus Posted September 1, 2012 Report Share Posted September 1, 2012 BBC News reportOnly in this case I have more than a bit of sympathy for the fish. In general use the term Shark Attack implies an unprovoked attack by the shark on a human otherwise engaged in alternate maritime activities.In this case the angler specifically targeted the fish, hooked it and hauled it out of the water and onto his boat where it bit his foot. "This one was a bad, bad fish," Mr Currie said. No this was one careless angler, after all that any fish is going to be seriously pissed off and a seven foot porbeagle is capable of doing something about it. In its position I'd have bitten his damned foot off.Perhaps they should revamp the title:Shark doesn't escape Fisherman attack off Islay.I'm also a bit dubious about his motivation "I took a crew of three up there to look for it because it had been attacking seals in the area." In general fishermen detest seals because they eat fish, seems unlikely that he's gone to so much trouble to protect them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.