andsome Posted September 14, 2004 Report Share Posted September 14, 2004 I don't normally approve of what can usually be described a silly stunts, but this was absolutely brilliant. It's a pity that 'Er indoors at Buck House wasn't there, that would really have upset the authorities and security people. We have first hand experience of the injustices handed out to some fathers. My daughter's fiancé has a little lad from a previous relationship. The CSA have had most of his income over recent years, even though his ex girl friend has a well paid job. He has paid out thousands of pounds over this period, taking her to court time and time again when she has denied access. Always some silly excuse, such as he is not well he has a cold etc etc. Suddenly My daughters fiancé can see his son as often as he wants to. She even phoned earlier this summer and said that they could have him for two weeks. WHY??????? Because she has a new boy friend, and wanted to go to Spain for two weeks with lover boy. It's about time something more was done to right all these wrongs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-pops- Posted September 14, 2004 Report Share Posted September 14, 2004 Brilliant as this stunt may have been, it and the numerous other security breaches there have been in the past 3(?) years or so makes one very concerned about just what the services controlling them are, and have been, doing.I, obviously, have no desire for a police state but these antics demonstrate just what a farce this whole security obsession is. The manufacturers of closed cicuit TV surveillance equipment can't keep up with the demand for their wares. Manufacturers of body armour are overwhelmed with orders and so on. Then one day the House of Commons gets splatted with purple powder, a few weeks later along comes Spiderman and ruins a day out for 3,000 or so people by climbing up the London eye. A couple of days after that Batman entertains the world at Buck House. There are sveral other incidents that didn't gain quite as much publicity. That's just one group - there are plenty of others.What a farce. :angry: :angry: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbers Dog Posted September 14, 2004 Report Share Posted September 14, 2004 The security to protect the Monarchy is a farce, and a waste of public money.It is costing the British taxpayer over £100 million to protect these leeches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andsome Posted September 14, 2004 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2004 The security to protect the Monarchy is a farce, and a waste of public money.It is costing the British taxpayer over £100 million to protect these leeches.:loldbz_2: :loldbz_2: :rockon: :rockon: :thumbup: :thumbup: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-pops- Posted September 14, 2004 Report Share Posted September 14, 2004 Apparently the only offence that has been committed is that of trespass which is a civil offence, not criminal so the police are powerless to do anything. :lol: :lol: :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catgate Posted September 14, 2004 Report Share Posted September 14, 2004 Just how much of todays "crime" is a result of legislation based on "vote catching" rather than being based on long term well being of the community. It is time pressure groups, for any cause, were seen as perverters of law, which is just what they are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andsome Posted September 15, 2004 Author Report Share Posted September 15, 2004 Just how much of todays "crime" is a result of legislation based on "vote catching" rather than being based on long term well being of the community. It is time pressure groups, for any cause, were seen as perverters of law, which is just what they are.Fathers have been trying for years to get justice regarding access to their children. No politician seems interested in doing anything about this problem. Did you actually read the history of my daughter's fiancé's case? No harm was done in this instance, (Batman's trespass), and in fact it has shown just how poor security is in this country. In my daughter's fiancé's case, as I said, his ex girl friend has flouted the court's decisions regarding access many, many times. There are thousands of similar cases throughout the country, what is your solution? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moon Posted September 15, 2004 Report Share Posted September 15, 2004 The entire, stupid, 'representative' democracy legislature process is gummed up. There is never any time to get anything done. Sixty million peeps can't be represented adequately by a few hundred, it just isn't possible eDemocracy will clear the way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanHo Posted September 15, 2004 Report Share Posted September 15, 2004 There is another side to most stories. If the Daily Mail is to be believed - Batman has a string of "Wives" and children he has deserted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moon Posted September 15, 2004 Report Share Posted September 15, 2004 ....not to mention a serious affection for Robin. :rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andsome Posted September 15, 2004 Author Report Share Posted September 15, 2004 There is another side to most stories. If the Daily Mail is to be believed - Batman has a string of "Wives" and children he has deserted.I am not in a position to comment on that, I just don't know. I do know however that there are millions of cases of genuine hardship caused by access problems, and excessive demands made by the CSA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-pops- Posted September 15, 2004 Report Share Posted September 15, 2004 There is another side to most stories. If the Daily Mail is to be believed - Batman has a string of "Wives" and children he has deserted.I wouldn't believe the Daily Mailicious even if they said it was 2004. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.