catgate Posted March 29, 2006 Report Share Posted March 29, 2006 A lot of stoats have had to die for this.http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticl...IN-IDENTITY.xml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andsome Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 What's the betting that they solve nothing and some kind of forgery will become rife. Will we be able to take out a mortgage to buy one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimv7 Posted April 8, 2006 Report Share Posted April 8, 2006 An email that I have recieved, disconcerting if true.Identity Cardsby Francis Stonor SaundersFormer arts editor of The New Statesman, author of The Cultural Cold War,Diabolical Englishman and The Devil's Broker, winner of the Royal HistoricalSociety's William Gladstone Memorial Prize."You may have heard that legislation creating compulsory ID Cards has passeda crucial stage in the [House of Commons][now the Lords]. You may feel thatID cards are not something to worry about, since we already have Photo IDfor our Passport and Driving License and an ID Card will be no different tothat. What you have not been told is the full scope of this proposed IDCard, and what it will mean to you personally.The proposed ID Card will be different from any card you now hold. It willbe connected to a database called the NIR, (National Identity Register),where all of your personal details will be stored. This will include theunique number that will be issued to you, your fingerprints, a scan of theback of your eye, and your photograph. Your name, address and date of birthwill also obviously be stored there.There will be spaces on this database for your religion, residence status,and many other private and personal facts about you. There is unlimitedspace for every other details of your life on the NIR database, which can beexpanded by the Government with or without further Acts of Parliament.By itself, you might think that this register is harmless, but you would bewrong to come to this conclusion. This new card will be used to check youridentity against your entry in the register in real time, whenever youpresent it to 'prove who you are'.Every place that sells alcohol or cigarettes, every post office, everypharmacy, and every Bank will have an NIR Card Terminal, (very much likethe Chip and Pin Readers that are everywhere now) into which your card canbe 'swiped' to check your identity. Each time this happens, a record ismade at the NIR of the time and place that the Card was presented. Thismeans for example, that there will be a government record of every time youwithdraw more than £99 at your branch of NatWest, who now demand ID forthese transactions. Every time you have to prove that you are over 18, yourcard will be swiped, and a record made at the NIR. Restaurants and offlicenses will demand that your card is swiped so that each receipt showsthat they sold alcohol to someone over 18, and that this was proved by theaccess to the NIR, indemnifying them from prosecution.Private businesses are going to be given access to the NIR Database. If youwant to apply for a job, you will have to present your card for a swipe. Ifyou want to apply for a London Underground Oyster Card, or a supermarketloyalty card, or a driving license you will have to present your ID Card fora swipe. The same goes for getting a telephone line or a mobile phone or aninternet account.Oyster, DVLA, BT and Nectar (for example) all run very detailed databasesof their own. They will be allowed access to the NIR, just as every otherbusiness will be. This means that each of these entities will be able tostore your unique number in their database, and place all your travel, phonerecords, driving activities and detailed shopping habits under your uniqueNIR number. These databases, which can easily fit on a storage device thesize of your hand, will be sold to third parties either legally orillegally. It will then be possible for a non-governmental entity to createa detailed dossier of all your activities. Certainly, the government willhave clandestine access to all of them, meaning that they will have acomplete record of all your movements, from how much and when you withdrawfrom your bank account to what medications you are taking, down to the levelof what sort of bread you eat - all accessible via a single unique number ina central database.This is quite a significant leap from a simple ID Card that shows your nameand face.Most people do not know that this is the true character and scope of theproposed ID Card. Whenever the details of how it will work are explained tothem, they quickly change from being ambivalent towards it.The Government is going to COMPEL you to enter your details into the NIR andto carry this card. If you and your children want to obtain or renew yourpassports, you will be forced to have your fingerprints taken and your eyesscanned for the NIR, and an ID Card will be issued to you whether you wantone or not. If you refuse to be fingerprinted and eye scanned, you will notbe able to get a passport. Your ID Card will, just like your passport, notbe your property. The Home Secretary will have the right to revoke orsuspend your ID at any time, meaning that you will not be able to withdrawmoney from your Bank Account, for example, or do anything that requires youto present your government issued ID Card.The arguments that have been put forwarded in favour of ID Cards can beeasily disproved. ID Cards WILL NOT stop terrorists; every Spaniard has acompulsory ID Card as did the Madrid Bombers. ID Cards will not 'eliminatebenefit fraud', which in comparison, is small compared to the astronomicalcost of this proposal, which will be measured in billions according to theLSE (London School of Economics). This scheme exists solely to exert totalsurveillance and control over the ordinary free British Citizen, and it willline the pockets of the companies that will creat the computer systems atthe expense of your freedom, privacy and money.If you did not know the full scope of the proposed ID Card Scheme before andyou are as unsettled as I am at what it really means to you, to this countryand its way of life, I urge you to email or photocopy this and give it toyour friends and colleagues and everyone else you think should know and whocares. The Bill has proceeded to this stage due to the lack of accurate andcomplete information on this proposal being made public. Together & hand inhand, we can inform the entire nation if everyone who receives this passesit on." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catgate Posted April 8, 2006 Author Report Share Posted April 8, 2006 This has been around for a week or two, in one form or another. The only way out of it seems to be to totally erase any political party who will not promise to repeal this legislation if elected. This matter should be at the forefront of every political meeting anywhere in the country. I'll bet it just gets ignored. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r4may Posted April 8, 2006 Report Share Posted April 8, 2006 Oh Well, We will all have learn to hack the NIR database so we can ensure we know what's on it. :P :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andsome Posted April 9, 2006 Report Share Posted April 9, 2006 Sounds like Big Brother, Big Sister and nanny and granddad too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Besty Posted April 9, 2006 Report Share Posted April 9, 2006 I dont agree with shops employers all your transactions being recorded. Do you realy mind tho if your prints etc are all recorded surley it will make life alot easier for the police which then means less crime less illegals and less grumpy old men (no offence just an expression) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andsome Posted April 9, 2006 Report Share Posted April 9, 2006 I dont agree with shops employers all your transactions being recorded. Do you realy mind tho if your prints etc are all recorded surley it will make life alot easier for the police which then means less crime less illegals and less grumpy old men (no offence just an expression)I have no objection to my details being on record as such. I do however object to all and sundry having access to these details. I also object to having to pay for an ID card out of a pension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanHo Posted April 9, 2006 Report Share Posted April 9, 2006 Why do people get so paranoid about identity cards and nvent all sorts of scare stories about them. If you have nothing to hide - you have nothing to woryy about.The writer argues that they will stop you drawing money from the bank if you do not have a valid card - but they will not stop benefit fraud. Surely - if they can stop you drawing money in one circumstance - why not in the other. In my opinion, identity cards can be justified solely on the grounds of preventing benefit and other identity frauds which are at scandalous levels.The fact that the government can access my records to determine that I wear Y fronts purchased from M&S is of course a great worry - or is it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r4may Posted April 9, 2006 Report Share Posted April 9, 2006 Another 'Big Brother' scenario :- http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/clic...ine/4886598.stm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catgate Posted April 9, 2006 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2006 Another 'Big Brother' scenario :- http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/clic...ine/4886598.stmVery interesting. What Albrecht Von Truchsess, from the German supermarket chain Metro Group, does not say is that Metro are going to save money by using this technique. He does not need to, because we know that nobody, these days, spends a penny (or pfennig...or cent)on anything, without a payback.What is not universally recognised is that all cost is labour. The iron ore cost nothing but the labour of digging it out of the ground and turning it into steel does. Similarly trees and plants cost nothing. The cost in in the labour of planting, tending and harvesting. The same with coal, oils etc etc.All this leads to the inevitable conclusion, that has been demonstrated so many times over, that reduction in cost=reduction in labour= less money in circulation= either less sales or more debt = need to reduce costs to generate more sales ad infinitum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.