Jump to content

I am sure it has been asked before, but....


deuces wild
 Share

Recommended Posts

...what do you consider a good AV program. I got a virus using Avast and am not so confident in it. I want to try Trend Micro but it requires you to shut down your firewall program...I use Zone Alarm and am happy with it. Norton (reportedly) is a resource hog.

I am willing to pay the money for a good program if that is what it takes.

Any thoughts? Thanks in advance for your comments.

Note: I hope this is the correct forum/room to post this in. Please move it to the appropriate forum if it is not. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've used AVG for many,many years. First of all the free version then, feeling a little guilty about having such good service for free for such a long time, I got the paid for version.

I've installed AVG in many machines that I have built for others as well as recommending it. Never had complaints about it.

As with all anti-virus software, it is vital that it is kept up to date - out of date A/V is worse than useless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can ask a million people what AV they use and you'll get a million answers, very different answers thrown back at you.

As long as you have AV you will be OK to a point as NO AV is 100% effective. The majority of the time it is the users incompetence to understand there product and what is required to keep it as effective as possible. Uderstanding a few DO's and DONT'S help as well.

I've used Norton AV and have no trouble with them, others to but there you go. You have a problem with Avast, others will not.

As for Norton being a Resource hog, well on modern machines I don't see how. Unless you value every byte of your RAM, your boot time etc.

One AV that never really gets a mention is NOD32: http://www.nod32.com/home/home.htm maybe check it out and report back.

My definition of good AV is one that works or at least has a history of good working. :wacko: It also has to be silent in it's operation, not always interupting the user. One that is easy to configure [although I would take 100% effectiveness over a naff GUI any day.] Automatically updating is a must as AV updates are as important as turning of the gas stove. For me Norton does this when it requires and I have not [touch wood] had any trouble yet. Email scanning [in and out] is almost a must. As viruses are sent through email let the AV sort it out. Not forgetting the golden rules of dealing with email along the way...

You can choose just about any AV [well apart from avast] and i'm sure you won't be dissapointed...with any. They'll all have there good and bad points but doesn't everything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, right now i use nis2004. and ive heard people say its a hog. but i have heard the nis2005 is way better cuz they have cut down on the resource hogging prgs. im really thinking bout going upgrade to nis2005. i was considering going to ayatem works and teh personal firewall, all norton but after confering with symantec about it , i found out you'll have to pay for 2 seperate services after the initial first year with purchase, decided if i do i will go w/ nis2005 instead. 1 package service fee, of course after the first years service w/purchase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy