catgate Posted July 31, 2008 Report Share Posted July 31, 2008 http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008...ficiency.energy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tankus Posted July 31, 2008 Report Share Posted July 31, 2008 the implications of this ..... if true ..... you would have thought front page everywhere Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andsome Posted August 1, 2008 Report Share Posted August 1, 2008 Watch it die a death. The oil industry will buy it up and kill it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-pops- Posted August 1, 2008 Report Share Posted August 1, 2008 One of the key things about the invention is that it requires a source of electricity before it will do the electrolytic conversion with the "magic" catalyst.Note that producing hydrogen and oxygen by the electrolysis of water is already carried out with quite good efficiency. Will this new catalyst show significant advantages over current systems? Will it disobey the fundamental physical laws and produce more energy than is input? Is this another table-top cold fusion hoax? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catgate Posted August 1, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 1, 2008 Will it disobey the fundamental physical laws and produce more energy than is input?It will just as soon as they can train the operator to walk on water/Is this another table-top cold fusion hoax?It's what ever you want to call it. It's a miracle, ranking alongside the three loaves of Hovis and the five small haddock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.