Jump to content

Have you followed this story?


deuces wild
 Share

Recommended Posts

Have you been following the tragic story of Terri Schiavo?

The timeline:

5 February 1990: Terri Schiavo collapses at home

November 1992: Michael Schiavo wins case against doctors he accused of misdiagnosing his wife; awarded $700,000 for her care and $300,000 for himself

Footage of Terri and her mother (file photo of images dating from 24 September 2004)

Terri's parents insist that she is capable of human interaction

29 July 1993: Schindlers file petition to have Mr Schiavo removed as Mrs Schiavo's guardian; case later dismissed

May 1998: Mr Schiavo files petition to remove Mrs Schiavo's feeding tube

11 February 2000: Judge Greer rules feeding tube can be removed

20 April 2001: Schindlers win a stay to exhaust appeals

23 April 2001: US Supreme Court refuses to intervene

24 April 2001: Feeding tube removed from Mrs Schiavo

26 April 2001: Judge orders doctors to reinsert tube

22 November 2002: After more hearings, Judge Greer rules there is no evidence that Mrs Schiavo has any hope of recovery and orders tube to be removed on 3 January 2003

13 December 2002: Judge Greer stays order to remove feeding tube to allow appeal

6 June 2003: Appeal court upholds Judge Greer's ruling

26 August 2003: Florida Governor Jeb Bush asks court to appoint new guardian for Mrs Schiavo; court does not act

17 September 2003: Judge orders feeding tube removal on 15 October

22 September 2003: Parents petition Federal Court

15 October 2003: Doctors remove Mrs Schiavo's feeding tube

21 October 2003: Florida's lower house passes a law giving Jeb Bush the power to order doctors to feed Mrs Schiavo - the law is known as "Terri's Law"

22 October 2003: Doctors start giving fluids to Mrs Schiavo and a day later her feeding tube is reinserted

30 October 2003: Michael Schiavo asks Florida Court to strike down Terri's law as unconstitutional

6 May 2004: County Court rules that Terri's Law is unconstitutional and a violation of the right to privacy

23 September 2004:Florida's Supreme Court strikes down Terri's Law

4 October 2004: Jeb Bush files motion for rehearing of Mrs Schiavo's case

The parents of Terri Schiavo react after a court ruling

The case has bounced back and forth between courts

1 December 2004: Jeb Bush asks US Supreme court to accept the case for review

25 January 2005: US Supreme Court rejects Jeb Bush's appeal to change ruling

23 February 2005: Judge extends a last-minute stay and orders that doctors must wait for a further court ruling before removing Mrs Schiavo's feeding tube

25 February 2005: County Court judge issues a three week stay

12 March 2005: Michael Schiavo refuses an offer of $1m (£520,000) from a Californian businessman to keep his wife alive

16 March 2005: Florida Appeals Court refuses to block removal of Mrs Schiavo's feeding tube and sets 18 March 2005 as the day the tube will be removed

17 March 2005: The Schindlers file an emergency motion at the US Supreme Court to block the removal of Mrs Schiavo's feeding tube.

They say lower courts need time to consider whether their daughter's religious freedom and due process rights have been violated.

18 March 2005: The US House of Representatives and US Senate both move to block the removal of Mrs Schiavo's feeding tube - but Judge Greer rejects the manoeuvres and orders the tube removed.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4358877.stm

==============

The latest news (not good):

(CBS/AP) Terri Schiavo's feeding tube was removed Friday despite an extraordinary, last-minute push by Republicans on Capitol Hill to use the subpoena powers of Congress to keep the severely brain-damaged woman alive.

Schiavo's family issued a statement on their Web site confirming that the tube had been disconnected. It is expected that it will take one to two weeks for Schiavo to die, provided no one intercedes and gets the tube reinserted.

The removal came amid a flurry of maneuvering by Schiavo's parents, state lawmakers and Congress to keep her alive.

Earlier Friday, Pinellas Circuit Judge George Greer refused a request from U.S. House attorneys to delay the removal, which he had previously ordered to take place at 1 p.m. EST. Greer determined that it should go forward about an hour after another judge issued a temporary delay blocking the tube's removal.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/03/18/...ain681495.shtml

Sad news. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has been a fair bit about this on the UK news over the past week. I don't know what I think about this. I can see both views.

I started to listen to the interviews but found the interviewer (Glen) a bit full on and had to stop listening. This is a sad case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Folks on death row in the US have more rights in being able to preserve their life than Terri received.

Her husband Michael received a sizable cash settlement some 10 years after Terri's hospitalization. It was only after the cash was received that he mentioned that it was Terri's wish not to be kept alive by artificial means. How convenient.

They have also recently found evidence of broken bones during a cat scan, even though Terri never had any bone injuries prior to her hospitalization.

Lastly, her husband has denied an opportunity for an autopsy following her death.

Terri is the smoking gun. It is in Michael's interest to let her die.

Game, set, match goes to Michael.

I hope Terri is without pain during her slow starvation and death of thirst.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terrible situation all round. I only know that I would not want to live in that state. I realise that some people would want to get rid of 'the burden' - but spare a thought of the agony of seeing a loved one in that situation and knowing it would not be how they would want to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The husband (who is engaged) would not allow the parents in the room during her last few minutes of life

I guess the various court action actions has strained relations somewhat ......

Pull the plug on me if I'm in that state ..Like Artist...I would not want my family to have a prolonged suffering .... It would not make much difference to me ....methinks ...!

Hard choices ...all around .....

Popes none to clever tonight ...either ...!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The husband (who is engaged) would not allow the parents in the room during her last few minutes of life

I guess the various court action actions has strained relations somewhat ......

Pull the plug on me if I'm in that state ..Like Artist...I would not want my family to have a prolonged suffering .... It would not make much difference to me ....methinks ...!

Hard choices ...all around .....

Popes none to clever tonight ...either ...!

Yep, but make sure you have it in writing. And make sure you are specific on what your definition of life support is.

A good lesson learned from this sad story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy