Jump to content

A New Nadir for Television


-pops-
 Share

Recommended Posts

UK television reached a lower point than ever before tonight, according to Teletext, with a programme dedicated to giving psychiatric help to a dog obsessed with eating poo (faeces).

No doubt there will be illustrated examples of the mutt doing this action.

What next? Humans doing the same thing?

What happened to entertainment - which, after all - is what television is supposed to be about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UK television reached a lower point than ever before tonight, according to Teletext, with a programme dedicated to giving psychiatric help to a dog obsessed with eating poo (faeces).

No doubt there will be illustrated examples of the mutt doing this action.

It isn't going to be a well know poodle, is it? :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UK television reached a lower point than ever before tonight, according to Teletext, with a programme dedicated to giving psychiatric help to a dog obsessed with eating poo (faeces).

No doubt there will be illustrated examples of the mutt doing this action.

It isn't going to be a well known poodle, is it? :rolleyes:

We can well hope. If it is I might well watch that. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who would actually watch that stuff, they must be brain dead. :P

My UK TV viewing is down to the news and the occasional documentary as the rest is CRAP. :angry:

The dog stuff or indeed anything about pampered pets isn't my idea of either entertainment or education, but I have to say that my viewing is appreciably wider than the subjects you outline.

Thos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who would actually watch that stuff, they must be brain dead. :P

My UK TV viewing is down to the news and the occasional documentary as the rest is CRAP. :angry:

I like the USA series - CSI New York/Miami, Law and Order, Prisoner, Invasion, ER, etc.... but NOT Friends and that ilk.

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funnily enough, 'er in bed and I have been discussing dropping our subscription to Sky. For £37.00 per month there really isn't, in our opinion, much on the damn thing, which will be rising to £38.00 per month by September this year. Sky is the only place you can see The Vicar of Dibley ,The thin Blue Line, Only Fools and Horses, Dinner Ladies and I could go on and on about the repeats, and it's four times per year for most of them. At the end of the year we have paid £444.00 for this lot. We may as well ditch it and stick with the freebies that are supplied under the licence fee. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funnily enough, 'er in bed and I have been discussing dropping our subscription to Sky. For £37.00 per month there really isn't, in our opinion, much on the damn thing, which will be rising to £38.00 per month by September this year. Sky is the only place you can see The Vicar of Dibley ,The thin Blue Line, Only Fools and Horses, Dinner Ladies and I could go on and on about the repeats, and it's four times per year for most of them. At the end of the year we have paid £444.00 for this lot. We may as well ditch it and stick with the freebies that are supplied under the licence fee. :(

Yes, I sometimes wonder whether it is worth it. We ditched the Movies package some time age and now use "Box Office" to watch films occasionally. But the great strength is sport and we do watch those channels. The convenience of the Sky+ box is well worth it, though I know that a non-sky replacement is obtainable.

Thos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I sometimes wonder whether it is worth it. We ditched the Movies package some time age and now use "Box Office" to watch films occasionally. But the great strength is sport and we do watch those channels. The convenience of the Sky+ box is well worth it, though I know that a non-sky replacement is obtainable.

Thos.

We don't have Sky+ Thos, I wouldn't pay the Hundred odd pound they wanted for the upgrade, not on top of what they are charging to have Sky on a monthly basis. We don't have Sports either because football is not one of my sports. I know that there is coverage of other types of sport on there but to me it is not worth the extra on top of the £37.00 per month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UK television reached a lower point than ever before tonight, according to Teletext, with a programme dedicated to giving psychiatric help to a dog obsessed with eating poo (faeces).

I just saw a few minutes of the programme and I must admit that it seemed to be very "tasteful"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've never had Sky TV and don't intend to.

My present viewing is limited to political programmes, gardening programmes (Christine's Garden was a refreshing change) the Lewis pilot (hope a series will follow) and I very much enjoyed Boris' Dream of Rome. Oh, and the odd drama if it looks promising :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy