Chris Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 Switch to News 24 as it's apparently going to be announced anytime now...Everyone is heading to court.[sorry for the lack of info in this post] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tankus Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 live online here BBCMotorcade has to be there 9.45pm our time for the verdict Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted June 13, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 live online here BBCMotorcade has to be there 9.45pm our time for the verdictWhat if it's not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tankus Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 Dunno .......... More bird ....?1 member of the Jury already has a book deal ...they may be a jury conference too somewhat off .......heh ... I still listen to Gary Glitter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tankus Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 whole families there ........ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted June 13, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 :o well there in court!Good Luck I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deuces wild Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 Not guilty. An OJ circus. Told you so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarecrow Man Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 10/10 NOT guilty... "An OJ Circus" is exactly right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 An absolute crock of sh*t.Waist of time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boris Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 I haven't seen him for ages - but he seems to have turned white with the shock ? :rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gandalph Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 Irrespective of other peoples views he has been tried and found not guilty by jury. People have got to respect that outcome whether they think it right or wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deuces wild Posted June 13, 2005 Report Share Posted June 13, 2005 Not me. I think the guy is a creep, a freak and guilty as hell. Money buys good lawyers. Just ask OJ.Books by the jurists are soon to come. Surprise, surprise. Get in line to get your copy early.Millions made by many. Millions paid to many. Black to white. Plastic surgery. Nose job. Baby over the balcony. His children treated like gods. Michael Jackson with no normal life. And why? Justice served? I doubt it. But I may be wrong. Our Creator knows the truth and that is all that matters. Enjoy your life Michael. Your career is finished. You are most likely penniless. And you had such potential as a young lad.So what went wrong? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarecrow Man Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 An absolute crock of sh*t.Waist of timeYes.Irrespective of other peoples views he has been tried and found not guilty by jury. People have got to respect that outcome whether they think it right or wrong.I respect him being found innocent. But I also respect all the innocent men in jail for this exact thing.If he was to be just another person with a 9-5 job, he would have been in jail a long time ago. I think "social status" and "money" had something to do with it.... But, he was found innocent. I cannot change that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ɹəuəllıʍ ʇɐb Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Well, sometimes an example needs to be set, and even "social status" and "money" is sometimes sent to jail. Michael is lucky that Martha has recently served that purpose, so there was no imminent need to set another example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andsome Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Irrespective of other peoples views he has been tried and found not guilty by jury. People have got to respect that outcome whether they think it right or wrong.I agree. I have no time for the freak show that surrounds this creature. I also cannot understand why the 10-o-clock news last night spent the first half hour outside the court. There is MUCH more important news that needs reporting. The crowd scenes were bordering on the ridiculous. The whole thing has been a farce and has only benefited the lawyers. As for the money owed by him, which appears to be in the region of $300,000,000, then it will serve the creditors right if they never see a penny. Anyone allowing another person to run up debts like this without calling a halt earlier deserves to loose the lot. For heavens sake I hope the media hype will now die down, and let us get back to the relative sanity of war, plague, pollution, and global warming etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CurlyWhirly Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Andsome, I agree especially with your quote: "As for the money owed by him, which appears to be in the region of $300,000,000, then it will serve the creditors right if they never see a penny. Anyone allowing another person to run up debts like this without calling a halt earlier deserves to lose the lot." You are talking sense here IMHO of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dadyassa Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 I dont think the outcome would have been the same if it had been me with my 300 € instead of M J. :D :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andsome Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 I dont think the outcome would have been the same if it had been me with my 300 € instead of M J. :D :DYou have THAT much?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dadyassa Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 I dont think the outcome would have been the same if it had been me with my 300 € instead of M J. :D :DYou have THAT much??Usually only on Friday ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarecrow Man Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Another view of this is his life is (if it wasnt already) ruined. Just like any other "sex offender" who has been proven innocent they will always have that title hanging over thier heads. Being such a popular person, loved by many and hated by more, he now has even more publicity than he could ever buy. Perhaps this was what he needed to get back into the "spotlight"... sickoWatch for another album in the next few years... :ninja: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-pops- Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Watch for another album in the next few years... :ninja:Initially another assemblage of all the previous catawauling noise he generated, no doubt. :( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tankus Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Thinking about it .....I can see where the jury is coming from ....... if there is doubt planted on the most serious issues ... then the whole evidence is in doubt ... your not allowed to convict on a percentage ....Ill bet a lot of the 12 are feeling very unclean this morning Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarecrow Man Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Innocent until proven 100% guilty. I've always agreed with this, and even in cases such as this, I still stand by it.BUT I do not feel bad for him. The guy has not made an album since 2001, and just last year sold over 1,000,000 copies of his albums... The guy does not need any more publicity. Just go away Michael.. It's over.... now go away... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deuces wild Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 Thinking about it .....I can see where the jury is coming from ....... if there is doubt planted on the most serious issues ... then the whole evidence is in doubt ... your not allowed to convict on a percentage ....Scarecrow Man said: Innocent until proven 100% guilty. I've always agreed with this, and even in cases such as this, I still stand by it.You are right. The prosecutor apparently put on a poor case and although some of the jurors have admitted they wanted to convict him, they could not based on the evidence provided.If that is true, they did the right thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rong Posted June 14, 2005 Report Share Posted June 14, 2005 It appears the whole thing was a witch hunt all the time, the prosecutor chappie has been going after him for 20 years. So if he's had 20 years collecting evidence and still failed that speaks volumes. I'm not a fan by the way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.