catgate Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 Does it not make you proud to be Britsh.http://news.monstersandcritics.com/uk/arti...tion_aid_pledgeWe can now watch our hospitals and welfare services contracting, our pensioners struggling to find sufficient to pay fuel bills and council tax, and the Westminster trough constantly being refilled, with a warm glow in our hearts knowing that we have such a careing, sharing Chancellor.I just wonder if his definition of "pledge" is the same as Tonies (ie breakable promise) or does he use it in the pawnbroker sense (ie we are going into hoc even further) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan2273 Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 Why do we have to keep giving money to these third world countries, where the politicians are more corrupt than our own.What is wrong with sorting the problems out in the UK and then if their is anything left making sure it gets used for what it was intended and that is not for lining the pockets of corrupt governments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belatucadrus Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 Not too sure I'd be thrilled to be offered an English education if I came from Mozambique. Potential prosecution by the CPS or the PC crew if you speak out of turn and at the end a crop of A grade A-levels that nobody believes in any more. Because simply being an illiterate ignoramus no longer qualifies you as a failure. It's a contentious term that could damage the fragile minds of today's kiddie winks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catgate Posted April 10, 2006 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 I wonder at the suitability of this man to be in charge of anything. He is committing the people of this country to a 10 year period of donordom. He will be seeking election in that period. Does he think the country is inhabited by moronic simpletons? Maybe he has been "advised", by one of the legion of advisors swilling about in the corridors of power, that all will be forgotten, but which advisor has advised him to "pledge" in the first place?It makes one wonder why we need the likes of Blair and Brown when their advisors are perfectly capable of fouling up the entire country on their own (and feathering their nests at the same time). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r4may Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 WE cannot afford to be this generous Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tankus Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 I REALLY dont understand this ....! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CurlyWhirly Posted April 10, 2006 Report Share Posted April 10, 2006 Why do we have to keep giving money to these third world countries, where the politicians are more corrupt than our own.What is wrong with sorting the problems out in the UK and then if their is anything left making sure it gets used for what it was intended and that is not for lining the pockets of corrupt governments.Very well said Alan.I agree 100% as IMHO charity begins at home. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belatucadrus Posted April 11, 2006 Report Share Posted April 11, 2006 I've a sneaky suspicion that Nelson Mandela massaging his enormous ego, may have helped him be so generous in his bid to buy himself a position as a statesman of world stature. But what the hell why should be bother it isn't his money and by the time the bill turns up he doesn't plan on being chancellor, so he won't have to worry about it then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andsome Posted April 11, 2006 Report Share Posted April 11, 2006 I have nothing against helping those less well off than ourselves in principle. It is NO good however to give money direct to the governments of these countries. The leaders are even more corrupt than our. If anything is to be given it should be done on a personal basis to a charity of the donors choice. I definitely don't want my money being given to some pumped up politician who will secret it away in a Swiss bank account. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catgate Posted April 11, 2006 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2006 After pondering a little longer I would like to know:=1 Who gave Brown the mandate to distribute money, taken from British taxpayers, to any overseas cause of his choseing?2 Where, in the New Labour election manifesto, did it say that the duties of the PM and his cabinet colleagues would include spend much of their time trying to rule the rest of the world (utilising our taxes), instead of doing what they were elected to do?3. What sort of a government is it that robs pension funds, wastes millions and millions of pounds on 'improving' the NHS into a state of penury, tells those that put it in power that they will have to work until they are at least 70, will have to pay for private health care and will also have to make provision for their own pensions (out of what is not forcibly removed from them by stealth taxes etc), so that this wonderfully caring government can go and cause a mess in other part of the world.Answers on a postcard to 10/11 Downing StreetWC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanHo Posted April 11, 2006 Report Share Posted April 11, 2006 I cannot find a postcard big enough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andsome Posted April 11, 2006 Report Share Posted April 11, 2006 It would need a whole 80 GB hard drive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thos Posted April 11, 2006 Report Share Posted April 11, 2006 Well, I was going to keep clear of political diatribes for a while but in the absence of any other comment with a word in favour of what Gordon Brown is trying to do, I feel I should attempt to show that not all of this forum's membership agree with the previous comments.Whilst, I too, have no wish to see any dictator's pockets lined with my money, the present scheme is part of a wholly welcome initiative aiming for every child in the world to get a primary school place. There are plans in place to ensure that the money goes solely for this purpose.We, in the UK, are part of the fifth richest country in the world and in spite of the comments here and elsewhere in this forum its citizens are well fed and prosperous compared with some parts of the world. We can and should be able to contribute to initiatives of this sort.Nevertheless, I took great amusement from this cartoon:-Thos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andsome Posted April 11, 2006 Report Share Posted April 11, 2006 A political debate on here just wouldn't be the same without you. :D :D :D :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catgate Posted April 11, 2006 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2006 We, in the UK, are part of the fifth richest country in the world Quotes such as this come up from time to time in various places and it usually is connected with the justification of giving money away. I have never seen any actual figures to support this view.However, when it comes to spending money on projects in this country like NHS, pensions, Real improvement to education, more police etc. etc we can never afford them.We can and should be able to contribute to initiatives of this sort. We can and should be consulted, as electors, as to whether this should be done, and if so by how much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanHo Posted April 11, 2006 Report Share Posted April 11, 2006 I don't quite understand what being part of the fifth richest country in the World means - we are a country and not a part of one. I cannot believe that the average UK resident is 5th in a World league table of riches - not if you include the whole population here - both legal and illegals.I don't often contribute to political postings but some recent ones have attracted my attention. I too feel that this government have exceeded their remit in giving away so much of our taxpayers money without the prior blessing of the electorate. Charity should begin at home. It is a matter of record that the countries with the richest resources (especially oil) are the bottom of the league when it comes to donating to the poorer nations. Only when we get our health and educational systems in order should we be indulging in such foreign aid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andsome Posted April 11, 2006 Report Share Posted April 11, 2006 I don't quite understand what being part of the fifth richest country in the World means - we are a country and not a part of one. I cannot believe that the average UK resident is 5th in a World league table of riches - not if you include the whole population here - both legal and illegals.I don't often contribute to political postings but some recent ones have attracted my attention. I too feel that this government have exceeded their remit in giving away so much of our taxpayers money without the prior blessing of the electorate. Charity should begin at home. It is a matter of record that the countries with the richest resources (especially oil) are the bottom of the league when it comes to donating to the poorer nations. Only when we get our health and educational systems in order should we be indulging in such foreign aid.EXACTLY. Charity is up to the individual donor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanHo Posted April 11, 2006 Report Share Posted April 11, 2006 I feel I am being slightly hypocritical in posting to this thread. For ages now I have sat on the touchline here watching the loony left, loony right, loony middle, loony liberals, loony fundamentalists, loony PC brigade and loony agnostics like myself have a go at each other in the forum as if it was of fundamental importance.But it is not - no-one here by posting their opinions is likely to make a difference to the opinions or beliefs of others in the forum who have a defined mind set - let alone the governement in the larger scheme of things.As individuals we may huff and puff all we like - but at the end of the day politicians will be politicians and carry on regardless. You can only hope that one day the ballot box will turn in your favour - but don't hold your breath.Frustrating innit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catgate Posted April 11, 2006 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2006 You can only hope that one day the ballot box will turn in your favour - but don't hold your breath.Frustrating innit Sadly it never will. It will always turn in favour of the politicians. What is needed is for a large number of younger people, with the necessary energies and education, to take heed of we boring old farts. Then take hold firmly of the current electoral system and totally destroy it. They can then build in its place a system totally devoid of parties, 'isms' and 'ities'.Unfortunately what is going on is "normal" to them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doug Posted April 11, 2006 Report Share Posted April 11, 2006 That sounds like a dictatorship to me. At least we only have a democratic dictatorship at present. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catgate Posted April 11, 2006 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2006 That sounds like a dictatorship to me. At least we only have a democratic dictatorship at present.Yes it does. I've conveyed the wrong impression, totally, by not chosing my words carefully enough.By system totally devoid of parties, 'isms' and 'ities'.I was trying to indicate a system that was not totally controlled by a group with vested interests. The use of parties, particularly when you get down to just a couple, is that government is more easily deflected from true democracy by unscroupulous leaders and their selfseeking supporters/backers. It is a paradox that diversity, beit Bio, Ethnic or Sexual in never far away from the lips of our current incumbants. Yet when it comes to 'decision' there is no room what so ever for diversity of opinion or view. But were the Palace of Westminster full of free minded people, there would certainly be more time spent in debate, but less dogma and fewer holy cows, and more decisions based on reality and not pious (?) hope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andsome Posted April 12, 2006 Report Share Posted April 12, 2006 Another thing about it all in this country is the House of Lords. I was with B'liar 100% when he said he wanted to reform it. I was naive enough to believe that he meant GENUINE reform. It is ridiculous that a bunch of people can help make decisions that affect us all, just by virtue of an accident of birth. This was further compounded by Lordships etc bestowed upon those who had had their time in the commons. What did we get for the reform? An even worse, longer list of those sent there as a favour of the party leaders. If we are to have a two house system, it's about time the second house was also elected, as in other countries. This election could take place say two years after the commons election.I take Alan's point about the fact that we on this forum cannot make any difference, but it doesn't half make you feel better to have your say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thos Posted April 12, 2006 Report Share Posted April 12, 2006 I have never seen any actual figures to support this view. We can and should be consulted, as electors, as to whether this should be done, and if so by how much.There are various measurements, depending on what you want the figures to prove ( :) ) such as gross GDP, per capita GDP, purchasing power and so on, but it is a fact that the UK is part of G7, the bloc of the 7 richest countries in the world.As to whether all citizens should be consulted, whether you like it or not those same citizens elected a Government to make these decisions. That is the system under which the country makes its collective mind up.I don't quite understand what being part of the fifth richest country in the World means - we are a country and not a part of one.Sorry, Alan, if my words are ambiguous. I meant that we as individuals, are part of the fifth richest country etc. As a whole, we are, of course, that country.But isn't all this semantics. I believe that the UK should help those less fortunate than ourselves. It is an accident of birth that we live here, with all of the advantages we have. Those children the Chancellor wants to help on our behalf deserve schooling and, providing the money does not go to corrupt rulers, I think we should applaud the initiative.To be honest, I feel quite disappointed that so many contributors to this topic, whose general contributions I respect, feel differently.Thos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spikeychris Posted April 12, 2006 Report Share Posted April 12, 2006 Charity begins at home. I hate this phrase more than I hate any other. Which charities? Acorns Children's Hospice TrustAction CancerAction for Peoples in ConflictAge ConcernAge Concern LancashireAge Concern Milton KeynesAge Concern Northern IrelandAge Concern SuffolkAge Concern YorkAlzheimer's SocietyAnimals in Distress Ardgowan HospiceArthritis Research CampaignArthur Rank HospiceASBAHAston-MansfieldBarnardo'sBarnsley (St Peter's) HospiceBeacon Centre for the BlindBethany Christian TrustBirmingham SettlementBlythswood TradingBrainwaveBreakBritish Heart FoundationBritish Red CrossButterwick Hospice RetailCancer Research UKCancer Research WalesCapability ScotlandCentral & Cecil Housing TrustChest, Heart & Stroke ScotlandChildline ScotlandChildren's Hospice Association ScotlandChildren's Hospice South WestClaire House Shops Ltd.CLICCompton HospiceCosgrove CareCotswold Care Hospice ShopsDevon Air Ambulance TrustDebRADemelza House Trading Ltd.Derian House Children's HospiceDogs TrustDorothy Kerin Trust (Burrswood)Douglas Macmillan Hospice ShopsEast Anglia Children's HospicesEden Valley HospiceEllenor HospiceEnable IrelandEssex Air AmbulanceExeter Leukaemia FundFARA FoundationFarleigh HospiceForce Cancer Charitygive2giveGreenwich & Bexley Cottage HospiceGuild CareHamelin HouseHarpenden MencapHarris HospiscareHaven House FoundationHeadway - The Brain Injury AssociationHelen House and Douglas HouseHelp The AgedHome Farm TrustHomeaid CaithnessHome-start TeessideHope House Children's HospiceHospice in the WealdHospice of St FrancisHospiscareIain Rennie Hospice At HomeKatharine House Hospice, BanburyKatharine House Hospice, StaffordKent Association for the BlindLindsey Lodge HospiceLeonard CheshireMare and Foal SanctuaryMarie Curie Cancer CareMartin House Children's HospiceMartlets HospiceMary Stevens HospiceMenphysMercy in ActionMinds MatterMyton Hamlet HospiceNaomi House Children's HospiceNational Association of Victim SupportNational Animal Welfare TrustNational Kidney Research FundNCHNorth Devon HospiceNotting Hill Housing TrustNottinghamshire HospiceOxfamOxfam Northern IrelandPasque HospicePaul Bevan Cancer FoundationPaul Sartori FoundationPDSAPeace Hospice Shops LtdPilgrims Hospices in East KentProspect HospiceQueen Elizabeth's Foundation For Disabled PeopleQueenscourt HospiceRelate CroydonRichard House Children's HospiceRoy Castle Retail Ltd.RSPCASalvation Army Trading Company LtdSave the Children FundScopeSenseSense ScotlandShooting StarSevern HospiceShakespeare HospiceShaw Trust RetailShelter ShopsShooting StarSimon Community Northern IrelandSobell House Hospice Charity Spitalfields Crypt TrustSpringhill HospiceSt Andrew's HospiceSt Ann's HospiceSt Barnabas Hospice ShopsSt Benedict's HospiceSt Catherine's HospiceSt Catherine's Hospice (Scarborough)St Clare's HospiceSt David's FoundationSt Elizabeth HospiceSt Elizabeth's CentreSt Gemma's HospiceSt Giles HospiceSt Helena HospiceSt John's Hospice - the Hospice in the Heart of LondonSt John's Hospice and Cancer Care ShopsSt John's Hospice In WirralSt Joseph's Hospice AssociationSt Leonard's HospiceSt Luke's (Cheshire) HospiceSt Luke's HospiceSt Luke's Hospice, BasildonSt Luke's Hospice, PlymouthSt Luke's Kenton Grange Hospice (Harrow & Brent)St Mary's HospiceSt Michael's HospiceSt Michael's Hospice, HampshireSt Nicholas' HospiceSt Oswalds HospiceSt Peter & St James Hospice ShopsSt Raphael's HospiceSt Richards HospiceSt Rocco's HospiceSt Teresa's HospiceSt Vincent de Paul Society, LondonSue Ryder CareTapping House HospiceTeeside HospiceTenovus, The Cancer CharityThe Action GroupThe Blue CrossThe Children's SocietyThe Children's TrustThe Extracare Charitable TrustThe Haven, WolverhamptonThe Martlets HospiceThe Mary Ann Evans HospiceThe Norman Laud AssociationThe Padley GroupThe Princess Alice HospiceThe Shakespeare HospiceThe South Bucks Hospice The Wayne Howard TrustThorne House Services For AutismTraidTreetops HospiceTrinity HospiceWakefield HospiceWales Air AmbulanceWalsall Hospice AppealWatford & District MencapWatford New Hope TrustWest Cumbria Hospice at HomeWeston Hospicecare MartWigan And Leigh HospiceWillen HospiceWoking HospiceWoodlands Hospice Charitable TrustWoodland Respite Care CentreYeldall Homeless ProjectsYMCA Englandyoung@nowShall we wait until these (a very small proportion) have been fully funded before we consider helping starving children elsewhere? Now I know this latest venture is education but empowerment leads to self reliance that leads to understanding issues that leads to problem solving. PLEASE don’t say charity begins at home. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catgate Posted April 12, 2006 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2006 You missed out the most important one:-Poor Children's Father's Beer Fund. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.